Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 6 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on London Olympics Bill 2005-06.


London Olympics Bill

My hon. Friend is right. Nobody is saying that Londoners would not have to bear their share of the burden if, despite the undertakings and expectations, there was an additional cost. We would pay our fair share like everybody else, but we are already making a specific extra commitment. We know that we have to do that; it could be for 10 or 12 years, which is not insignificant, especially for people on the lowest incomes, so we think that contribution should be capped. The last point that I want to make is this. As you would imagine, Mr. Deputy Speaker, this proposal has been debated across the political parties in London. As the Minister knows, when it went to the London Assembly, 14 members of the Assembly across all parties, including the Minister’s, supported it; no one opposed it.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
440 c776 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disability Compensation Compulsory purchase Betting Advertising Costs Business Council tax Contracts for services Finance Land Greater London Greater London Authority Infrastructure Facilities Local government Property transfer Planning Olympic Games National Lottery Location Paralympic Games Sales Regional planning and development Sports Touting Transport for London Tickets Regional development agencies London Development Agency London 2012 Organising Committee Olympic Delivery Authority
Legislation
London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk