Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 6 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on London Olympics Bill 2005-06.


London Olympics Bill

The hon. Gentleman says, ““Funny, that””. People are elected, as he was elected for the Rhondda, to represent the people in their communities. What I am trying to say is that this issue is not divisive politically; there is a unity of view. Just as there is a broad unity of view in London that we should have the games, that we shall make a great success of the games and that we want the games to do well, there is equally a view that there should be a financial responsibility on all of us—a discipline that limits the amount that we expect Londoners to pay. If that can be agreed, it will be an additional reason why Londoners will support the games and the planning for the games in the years ahead with even greater enthusiasm. I hope that, if the Minister does not accept the proposal today, he will at least accept its merit and agree that it may have to be part of the eventual outcome of the deliberations on the Bill.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
440 c776-7 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disability Compensation Compulsory purchase Betting Advertising Costs Business Council tax Contracts for services Finance Land Greater London Greater London Authority Infrastructure Facilities Local government Property transfer Planning Olympic Games National Lottery Location Paralympic Games Sales Regional planning and development Sports Touting Transport for London Tickets Regional development agencies London Development Agency London 2012 Organising Committee Olympic Delivery Authority
Legislation
London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk