Proceeding contribution from Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 7 December 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill.
Terrorism Bill
I am sorry to interfere again. Under subsection (9)(b) and (c), he has to prove that the publication,"““neither expressed his views nor had his endorsement””." It could be said that someone who was acting in accordance with his profession or duties did not endorse it, but nevertheless it might represent his views. Is that something that would prevent him taking advantage of this defence? It looks like it. But it would be very strange indeed if it did.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c649
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Crimes of violence Crimes against property ICT Jurisdiction Incitement Fines Libraries Internet Journalism Police Prosecutions Publications Sentencing Universities Terrorism Training Research Students Academic freedom Propaganda Encouragement of terrorism Bookshops
- Legislation
- Terrorism Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:30:31 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_284903
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_284903
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_284903