Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Elton (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 7 December 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill.

Terrorism Bill

I should be happy if he would. All he has done is confirm what I thought the meaning was without giving a reason for it. The difficulty would be removed by my pressing my Amendment No. 112 and removing the exemption. I had hoped that he would be able to enlighten me before then. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 9 agreed to. Clause 10 [Misuse of devices or material and misuse and damage of facilities]: [Amendments Nos. 90 and 91 not moved.] Clause 10 agreed to. Clause 11 [Terrorist threats relating to devices, materials or facilities]: [Amendments Nos. 92 and 93 not moved.] Clause 11 agreed to. Clauses 12 and 13 agreed to. Clause 14 [Maximum penalty for certain offences relating to nuclear material]: [Amendments Nos. 94 and 95 not moved.] Clause 14 agreed to. Clause 15 agreed to. Clause 16 [Preparatory hearings in terrorism cases]:

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c725-6 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Crimes of violence Crimes against property ICT Jurisdiction Incitement Fines Libraries Internet Journalism Police Prosecutions Publications Sentencing Universities Terrorism Training Research Students Academic freedom Propaganda Encouragement of terrorism
Legislation
Terrorism Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk