Proceeding contribution from Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Compensation Bill [HL].
Compensation Bill [HL]
It seems to me that we are now moving so far from the original motivation for introducing Clause 1, which was the problem with school trips and similar activities undertaken by Guides and Scouts, and so on, that this is becoming another argument for not having Clause 1 at all and for leaving the courts to recognise, as they do, that there are extremely varied circumstances in which it is reasonable not to prevent a risk. Such activities are not necessarily confined to leisure activities or children’s activities or anything of that kind and indeed are so wide that they cannot be defined.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c213-4GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Complaints Children Compensation Courts Accidents Common law Liability Insurance Extracurricular activities Personal injury Negligence Outdoor education Schools Training Regulation Voluntary work Risk assessment Small claims
- Legislation
- Compensation Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:57:12 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287436
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287436
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287436