Proceeding contribution from Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Compensation Bill [HL].
Compensation Bill [HL]
This has been a useful development triggered by my noble friend Lord Lucas. If I recall the case to which the noble Baroness referred, I would have known it as ““The Wagon Mound””. I am talking a little from memory, but I recall that in that case Lord Reid drew a contrast with Bolton v Stone. The Appellate Committee held that it was not negligent for a cricket club to do nothing about the risk of someone being injured by a cricket ball being hit out of the ground. The difference was that the cricket club was carrying out a lawful and socially useful activity in organising a cricket match and it would have had to stop playing cricket at the ground. That was the difference. My noble friend has caused us to retirer pour mieux sauter for a moment. I translate for the benefit of the noble Baroness: to take a step back to consider how better to proceed.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c218GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Complaints Children Compensation Courts Accidents Common law Liability Insurance Extracurricular activities Personal injury Negligence Outdoor education Schools Training Regulation Voluntary work Risk assessment Small claims
- Legislation
- Compensation Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:23:28 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287446
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287446
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287446