Proceeding contribution from Earl of Erroll (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Compensation Bill [HL].
Compensation Bill [HL]
I entirely agree with what the noble Baroness has just said. I do not think the words are ideal, particularly as a result of the previous debate. It highlights a particular point that could have got lost in the previous debate. That was why I wanted to speak to it separately. For clarification, I should say that the noble Lord, Lord Hunt of Wirral, has very kindly referred to me as his noble friend. I like to think as Cross Benchers we are friendly with everyone in the House, on all sides. Please do not take that to assume that just because I am sitting facing the Minister, I have joined the Conservative Benches in any permanent way. I am still firmly a Cross Bencher. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 6 and 7 not moved.]
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c220GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Complaints Children Compensation Courts Accidents Common law Liability Insurance Extracurricular activities Personal injury Negligence Outdoor education Schools Training Regulation Voluntary work Risk assessment Small claims
- Legislation
- Compensation Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:18:52 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287453
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287453
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287453