Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Compensation Bill [HL].


Compensation Bill [HL]

But the noble Baroness will understand that this is a disjunctive addition. Therefore, it does not add in any way. It just gives another alternative. Therefore, it does not matter whether it encompasses activities which are clearly desirable, because they are already covered by paragraphs (a) and (b). This merely adds another paragraph to widen the clause to cover areas that might not be caught rather than prevent activities which are already caught and are then, for some reason, disallowed. That is why it is pleaded in the disjunctive rather than the conjunctive form.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c223GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Complaints Children Compensation Courts Accidents Common law Liability Insurance Extracurricular activities Personal injury Negligence Outdoor education Schools Training Regulation Voluntary work Risk assessment Small claims
Legislation
Compensation Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk