Proceeding contribution from Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Compensation Bill [HL].
Compensation Bill [HL]
But the noble Baroness will understand that this is a disjunctive addition. Therefore, it does not add in any way. It just gives another alternative. Therefore, it does not matter whether it encompasses activities which are clearly desirable, because they are already covered by paragraphs (a) and (b). This merely adds another paragraph to widen the clause to cover areas that might not be caught rather than prevent activities which are already caught and are then, for some reason, disallowed. That is why it is pleaded in the disjunctive rather than the conjunctive form.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c223GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Complaints Children Compensation Courts Accidents Common law Liability Insurance Extracurricular activities Personal injury Negligence Outdoor education Schools Training Regulation Voluntary work Risk assessment Small claims
- Legislation
- Compensation Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:56:52 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287457
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287457
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287457