Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Compensation Bill [HL].


Compensation Bill [HL]

It would be very much up to one party—in this case the defendant—to persuade the court that there would be consequences that might reasonably be put forward as consequences which would be contrary to the public interest. In effect, it would be the court that would decide whether the defendant had put forward a reasonable case. But we could phrase it in a different way. It is merely that this is the way in which the legal brains who thought up this amendment have put it. I did not argue with them at the time, but I will now.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c224GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Complaints Children Compensation Courts Accidents Common law Liability Insurance Extracurricular activities Personal injury Negligence Outdoor education Schools Training Regulation Voluntary work Risk assessment Small claims
Legislation
Compensation Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk