Proceeding contribution from Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Compensation Bill [HL].
Compensation Bill [HL]
I am very grateful for that. I am slightly nervous about it because I have been at pains to stress that in Clause 1 we do not seek to change the law. We seek to clarify whatever words Members of the Committee prefer. I am not entirely certain that ““defendant”” reflects the current situation. It may be a slight amendment to the current situation, which I would be keen to avoid for the reasons that I have given earlier. I would be grateful if the noble Lord would press the legal brains with whom he has discussed this. Perhaps we can agree to discuss this further before the next stage of the Bill.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c224GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Complaints Children Compensation Courts Accidents Common law Liability Insurance Extracurricular activities Personal injury Negligence Outdoor education Schools Training Regulation Voluntary work Risk assessment Small claims
- Legislation
- Compensation Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:18:50 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287460
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287460
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287460