Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Harry Cohen (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 16 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Equality Bill (HL).


Equality Bill [Lords]

That sort of issue provides a perfect case for having a London committee. That point could not be more relevant. However, I will not get drawn into that; I shall discuss that matter with my hon. Friend on another day and another occasion. I shall read another part of the Mayor’s briefing, although it is a bit jargony. I want to read it into the record, because I think that the point is made. The Mayor’s staff say:"““A Greater London Committee would enhance the work of the CEHR by helping to ensure . . . a regional focus on London appropriate to London’s size, demography, complexity and diversity, and experience in developing and delivering equality policies . . . appropriate engagement with London’s unique governance arrangements . . . synergy between regional strategies and national strategy and policy””" and"““tailored stakeholder engagement and dialogue, which will aid clear and transparent channels of communication.””" That is a bit jargony, but when hon. Members read it in Hansard, they will see the point.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
441 c629 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disability Admissions Age Disability Rights Commission Commission for Racial Equality Bureaucracy Delegated legislation Committees Equality Human rights EU law Gender Equality and Human Rights Commission Equal Opportunities Commission Exemptions Faith schools Harassment Legal representation Facilities Powers Public appointments Pupils Staff Race relations Schools Religion Transport Small businesses Sexuality Transgender people
Legislation
Equality Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk