Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Viscount Eccles (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 25 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Compensation Bill [HL] 2005-06.


Compensation Bill [HL]

The word ““professional”” must have been tested in the courts many times. I would just like to be sure that we do not assume that it is a term of art that can be used in different contexts and different ways. In court, what does it actually mean? Does it mean that you have to be a member of a profession and then you have to show you are a member of a profession? I daresay that some of the people in claims management services, maybe even trades union officials, might have quite a hard job demonstrating that they were professionally qualified for this sort of activity. I do not know how the courts have interpreted the word, but I think that it would be worth checking.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c349GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Complaints Compensation Consumers Accountancy Advertising Direct selling Legal profession Finance Fees and charges Insurance Legal opinion Financial Services Authority Protection Professions Negligence Standards Regulation Claims management services Claims Standards Council
Legislation
Compensation Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk