Proceeding contribution from Viscount Eccles (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 25 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Compensation Bill [HL] 2005-06.
Compensation Bill [HL]
The word ““professional”” must have been tested in the courts many times. I would just like to be sure that we do not assume that it is a term of art that can be used in different contexts and different ways. In court, what does it actually mean? Does it mean that you have to be a member of a profession and then you have to show you are a member of a profession? I daresay that some of the people in claims management services, maybe even trades union officials, might have quite a hard job demonstrating that they were professionally qualified for this sort of activity. I do not know how the courts have interpreted the word, but I think that it would be worth checking.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 677 c349GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Complaints Compensation Consumers Accountancy Advertising Direct selling Legal profession Finance Fees and charges Insurance Legal opinion Financial Services Authority Protection Professions Negligence Standards Regulation Claims management services Claims Standards Council
- Legislation
- Compensation Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:38:35 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294550
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294550
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294550