Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Darling of Roulanish (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 8 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Road Safety Bill [Lords].


Road Safety Bill [Lords]

It is difficult to research something that has not yet happened. My own belief is that most people start from the point of view that they do not want any points on their licence or to be fined. I am not sure that that many people say, ““I don’t mind getting two points, but I don’t want three.”” I look at this issue in a slightly different way: we should distinguish between someone who does 36 mph and someone who does 66 mph, and that is why the graduated scheme is better. I recognise that people have strong views on this proposal, and the last time we consulted on it, the division was about 50:50, with slightly more in favour of graduated penalties. If the Bill is passed, the next stage will be to consult on specific proposals, and depending on that consultation, we will put them before both Houses and they will be voted on. We must ensure that people appreciate that keeping their speed low is the important thing, but when someone does break the law, the punishment should fit the crime. Some graduation is necessary, but when we discuss this issue in Committee, Members will doubtless let us know what they think.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
443 c835-6 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Children Death Casualties Cameras Cycling First aid Driving under influence Large goods vehicles Motor vehicles Mobile phones Registration Schools Safety Roads Road signs and markings Speed limits Road traffic offences Safety belts Summertime Sleep apnoea Driving licences
Legislation
Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk