Proceeding contribution from Stephen Ladyman (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 8 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Road Safety Bill [Lords].
Road Safety Bill [Lords]
The right hon. Gentleman was kind enough to give me advance notice that he was thinking of raising that point, which I know he wants to explore further in Committee. The answer to his question is no; the intention is that it will not be necessary for such vehicles to be insured. Either they will be SORNed, in which case there will be no need for insurance, or there will have been no licensing activity since 1998, so a SORN will not be necessary.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 443 c870
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Death Casualties Cameras Cycling First aid Driving under influence Large goods vehicles Motor vehicles Mobile phones Registration Schools Safety Roads Road signs and markings Speed limits Road traffic offences Safety belts Summertime Sleep apnoea Driving licences
- Legislation
- Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-26 17:48:10 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_306066
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_306066
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_306066