Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Owen Paterson (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 8 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Road Safety Bill [Lords].


Road Safety Bill [Lords]

That intervention is helpful. Perhaps we can examine the definition of dangerous driving, which carries a maximum sentence of 14 years, to see whether we can plug that gap. Hon. Members on both sides of the House have raised examples, and there is clearly a problem. We are concerned in principle that the sentence will depend on the effect of the action, which could be capricious. As I have said, a fit young man hit at 30 mph in a town might survive because of an effective intervention—a doctor or nurse might be nearby or the ambulance might be very quick—but the same impact would kill a person in the country. In such cases, someone will go to jail and someone will not.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
443 c906 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Children Death Casualties Cameras Cycling First aid Driving under influence Large goods vehicles Motor vehicles Mobile phones Registration Schools Safety Roads Road signs and markings Speed limits Road traffic offences Safety belts Summertime Sleep apnoea Driving licences
Legislation
Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk