Proceeding contribution from Lord Garden (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 8 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Civil Aviation Bill.
Civil Aviation Bill
My Lords, I am most grateful to the Minister for clarifying the position. He will recall that in Grand Committee part of the point was that, given the international opprobrium attached to extraordinary rendition, we were in a very fortunate position that the Bill had arrived at the right time for the Government to show to the world how they felt. Since the Minister has now said that the amendment would not wreck the Bill and that the powers that it proposes are not different from powers that are already there, could he finally tell us why he does not think that this is a signal that his Government would like to send?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c848
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Deportation Aviation Armed conflict Air pollution Aircraft Airports Air routes Guide dogs Human rights Liability Pets Noise Visual impairment Torture Rendition
- Legislation
- Civil Aviation Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-26 17:39:38 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_306394
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_306394
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_306394