Proceeding contribution from Lord Goodman of Wycombe (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 5 July 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Finance (No 2) Bill.
Finance (No. 2) Bill
I am grateful for the opportunity to speak in this debate. As this might be my last chance to contribute to the Bill, I should like to pause and thank everyone from PricewaterhouseCoopers and elsewhere who has provided me with advice on technical aspects of the Bill over the past few weeks. It is appropriate to use the word ““technical”” for clause 99 because, as the hon. Member for Wolverhampton, South-West (Rob Marris) intimated, it is a difficult provision. As he said, we discussed the clause in Committee, and he will recall that I asked questions about it when it was debated on 6 June—as, indeed, did he. Having had time to reflect on the debate in Committee, and having reread the relevant proceedings in Hansard, I am not entirely happy.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 448 c887
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Accountancy Companies Decommissioning British Nuclear Fuels Corporation tax Computers Climate change levy Fraud EU countries Income tax Film Exemptions Excise duties EU internal trade Income Equipment Investment trusts Nuclear Decommissioning Authority Nuclear power stations Property Registration Tax allowances Tax avoidance Taxation VAT Real estate investment trusts
- Legislation
- Finance (No. 2) Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 23:13:07 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_335155
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_335155
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_335155