Proceeding contribution from Lord Darling of Roulanish (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 11 July 2006. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Energy Review.
Energy Review
I am grateful to my hon. Friend for his welcome for much of what is in the review. During his nine years as a Minister, he substantially contributed to the Government’s thinking, particularly on energy efficiency. In relation to nuclear, I refer him to what I said a short while ago about the costs, and about the contributions to be made by the industry. He mentioned the difficulties in the past. Quite simply, that is a classic case of something that happened to successive Governments too often: people did not make the right calculations and, in the case of the nuclear industry, they did not factor in all the costs that they would have to meet. I am clear that, if generators come forward with a proposal, they must meet the costs of the construction, running and decommissioning of a nuclear power station.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 448 c1273
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Conservation Combined heat and power Air pollution Climate change Carbon dioxide Energy Electricity generation Energy supply Oil Natural gas Nuclear power stations Pollution control Renewable energy Renewable transport fuel obligation Energy Policy Progress Review
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-26 17:15:40 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_336232
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_336232
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_336232