Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl of Erroll (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 July 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Police and Justice Bill.


Police and Justice Bill

My Lords, I have had a certain amount of e-mails and discussions about these clauses. In general I think they are a good idea, so they should go through. There is very little difference between the Government’s amendments and those of the noble Earl, Lord Northesk. The only thing I would add is that it has always worried me how you define the difference between a denial-of-service attack where it comes from one point or a set of netbots, and someone demanding that everyone lobby their MP on a particular issue so suddenly that 100,000 e-mails are sent from different single points to one central server. Actually, maybe the latter case should be made illegal, although I cannot think how it could. I apologise for hesitating; I had not thought this out very hard. There are problems around it that probably need to be addressed, as the noble Earl was saying. With the general proviso that we need to think further about the issue, I welcome these amendments.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
684 c607 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Access Children Criminal proceedings Crime Courts Computers Cameras Audit Commission Arrest warrants Evidence ICT Extradition Inspections Documents Functions Internet International law Police Powers Prisoners Pornography Police authorities Reciprocal arrangements Sentencing Treaties Sexual offences Trials Right of search USA Computer viruses Cryptography Hacking
Legislation
Police and Justice Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk