Proceeding contribution from Lord Brittan of Spennithorne (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 July 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Police and Justice Bill.
Police and Justice Bill
If the current situation is so entirely satisfactory, as the Minister seems to be saying, why on earth do we want the treaty to be ratified by the United States? Is it really just in order to clarify the situation and to destroy the myths that she has referred to? If not, what benefits will we get from ratification of the treaty which we do not have at the moment? She has not said anything about that.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 684 c647-8
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Access Children Criminal proceedings Crime Courts Computers Cameras Audit Commission Arrest warrants Evidence ICT Extradition Inspections Documents Functions Internet International law Police Powers Prisoners Pornography Police authorities Reciprocal arrangements Sentencing Treaties Sexual offences Trials Right of search USA Computer viruses Cryptography Hacking
- Legislation
- Police and Justice Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-16 21:02:03 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_336643
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_336643
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_336643