Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Ian McCartney (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 19 March 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill [Lords].


Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill [Lords]

There are issues of implementation, but that is all that they are. They are not issues of principle. Surely the Liberal Democrats are not saying that they want us to remove this measure from the Bill, as that would disbar the people who use postal services in their millions from having redress if mistakes are made. That is a ludicrous position to take. It is one thing to say that we need to ensure that the implementation of the provisions is effective and that there is proper consultation—which there is; these people are part of the fortnightly and monthly meetings on the implementation strategy, as of right—but it is quite another thing to say that we should not include the measures in the Bill, leaving the users of postal services with no redress until such time as another Bill is introduced. The Liberal Democrats are adopting a nonsensical position.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
458 c609 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Complaints Compensation Criminal records Consumers Business Closures Direct selling Electricity Financial services Estate agents Gas and Electricity Consumer Council Qualifications Ofwat Protection Property transfer Natural gas Mergers Ombudsman Office of Fair Trading Postal services National Consumer Council Scotland Water supply Regulation Wales Rented housing Consumer Council for Postal Services Consumer Direct
Legislation
Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk