Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Rooker (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 14 May 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Greater London Authority Bill.

Greater London Authority Bill

I was going to ask the noble Lord, Lord Hanningfield, and the noble Baroness about that. I pick on one specific issue raised that I used in both sets of notes. By accepting this amendment, or indeed the other amendment which takes out the words from line 37 to the end of the page 43, we would delete the requirement to consult anyone in the energy field—the consumers, the regulator or the energy companies. Is that a good idea? I do not think so, but I have heard no answer from the proponents of the amendment.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
692 c12GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Accountability Aviation Air pollution Climate change Devolution Carbon dioxide Council tax Finance Environment protection Greater London Energy Drugs Greater London Authority Landfill Local government Local government finance Publications Misuse Pollution control Public participation Mayor of London Museum of London National Consumer Council Waste management Renewable energy Technology Research Carbon emissions London Assembly Government Office for London Greenhouse gas emissions Public health
Legislation
Greater London Authority Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk