Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 11 June 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.


Pensions Bill

moved Amendment No. 139: 139: After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause— ““Report on tax relief on pension contributions The Secretary of State shall, not later than 1st April 2008, prepare and publish a report on tax relief on pension contributions, including— (a) the annual cost to the Treasury of these reliefs including projections for the following five tax years; (b) the extent to which the existing tax relief on pensions is— (i) affordable, and (ii) properly focussed, and (iii) comprehensible; (c) the amount of pensions tax relief received by the average household in each income decile; and (d) plans to reform tax relief to meet the criteria of fairness, affordability and incentivising saving.”” The noble Lord said: I tabled the amendment to put down a marker to stress our view that the existing tax relief on pensions is unfair, regressive and too skewed towards higher earners. The simple fact is that over half of tax relief goes to top-rate taxpayers, and about another 15 per cent goes to people who would be top-rate taxpayers were it not for this tax relief. That means that almost two-thirds of tax relief on pension saving goes to people who are better off. In our debate on the previous amendment, the Minister said that pensions outcomes for womenwere unfair. I welcome the interest that the Equal Opportunities Commission has shown in my amendment, and make its point that tax relief is unfair to women because they do not make up nearly such a large share of high earners as men. Four-fifths of tax relief at the top rate goes to men, which is a good deal more than their share of the labour force. I do not propose to press the point further, except to say that tax relief on pension contributions is going up quite quickly: it was £15 billion in 2005-06, and latest estimates are approaching £18 billion. That is happening particularly because under the new rules, on SIPPS in particular, quite a lot of better-off people are taking the opportunity to put in substantial sums—more than £200,000 a year—which again is proving to be quite a substantial tax break. One always has to remember that people get tax relief at the top rate and are able to take back 25 per cent of the money, often quite quickly, as a tax-free lump sum. We also believe that it is unfair because quite a number of people get top-rate tax relief when they make their pension contributions, but they pay only standard rate tax when they draw their pension in retirement. In that sense it is unfair as well. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
692 c1573-4 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Data protection Costs Annuities Allowances Civil service Advisory services Conflict of interests Women Equality Finance Families Freedom of information ICT Information Discrimination Misconduct Private sector NHS Low incomes Northern Ireland Pay Public appointments Workplace pensions Pensions Public sector Public participation Standards Teachers Small businesses Tax allowances Pensions Commission Gender impact assessment Personal Accounts Delivery Authority Pensions Advisory Service National employment savings trust scheme
Legislation
Pensions Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk