Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from David Davis (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 1 April 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Counter-Terrorism Bill.


Counter-Terrorism Bill

The right hon. Gentleman objected. He wanted to say, ““Not charged””, and the difference is as follows. I went to see the police who ran that operation, and I talked to them about the three people who were released uncharged. I said to them, ““In that case, did you put them on control orders, where the level of proof is lower?”” They said, ““No.”” I asked, ““Did you put them under surveillance?”” They said, ““No.”” I asked, ““Have you got them under continuing investigation?”” They said, ““No.”” I asked, ““Are you telling me they are innocent?”” They said, ““Yes.”” The Home Secretary arranged for me to see those gentlemen and the man who ran Operation Overt. ““Innocent”” is the word, and the right hon. Gentleman will have to live with it, whether he likes it or not.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
474 c667 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Crime prevention Criminal investigation Administration of justice Detainees Assets Crown Prosecution Service Coroners Borders Juries Immigration controls Offenders Police Powers Parliamentary procedure Police interrogation Media Minority groups Treasury Islam Sentencing Terrorism Security Travel restrictions
Legislation
Counter-terrorism Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk