Proceeding contribution from Lord Dixon-Smith (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 4 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Housing and Regeneration Bill.
Housing and Regeneration Bill
One way of avoiding this problem would be if the Homes and Communities Agency simply did not purchase burial grounds. Then we would not have this difficulty. Of course, the Minister may be able to explain why the Homes and Communities Agency must purchase burial grounds, although, for the life of me, I cannot think of a reason. The same argument could be reasonably applied to consecrated ground. I accept that there is a possible issue regarding town and community design when one is dealing with very large developments, but I would have thought that that would be exceedingly rare, and the actual ““need”” to purchase this land would have to be proved before such a situation arose.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 702 c78-9GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Companies Compulsory purchase Cemeteries Brownfield sites Allotments National landscapes Housing Land Land use Green belt Local government Planning permission Planning Property development National parks Unadopted roads Waiting lists Transport Utilities Rights of way Regeneration Homes and Communities Agency
- Legislation
- Housing and Regeneration Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:30:04 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_477019
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_477019
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_477019