Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Andrews (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 4 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Housing and Regeneration Bill.


Housing and Regeneration Bill

How can anyone dispute that? The anomaly in the Bill has been inherited from the powers of the current bodies, which reinforces the point made earlier by the noble Viscount, Lord Eccles. We consulted on the basis that the HCA would have powers no less wide than those of its predecessor bodies. To secure that, we modelled many of the provisions in the Bill on the legislation that framed the Urban Regeneration Agency, the Commission for the New Towns and the Housing Corporation. The condition to which the amendment refers was modelled on the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993. I agree with the noble Lord that, given the exceptional circumstances under which the designation powers are likely to be considered, Condition 2 seems highly unlikely to ever provide justification for the use of the designation order powers. I agree with the intent behind the amendment. I would like to take the opportunity to consider it further and return to the matter on Report.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c108-9GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Companies Compulsory purchase Cemeteries Brownfield sites Allotments National landscapes Housing Land Land use Green belt Local government Planning permission Planning Property development National parks Unadopted roads Waiting lists Transport Utilities Rights of way Regeneration Homes and Communities Agency
Legislation
Housing and Regeneration Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk