Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord De Mauley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 12 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Energy Bill.


Energy Bill

I thank the noble Lords, Lord Teverson and Lord Woolmer, for their contributions and the important questions that they raised in this context. I also thank my noble friend Lord Jenkin for highlighting a rather important point about onshore storage. I particularly thank the noble Lord, Lord Oxburgh, for his extremely interesting intervention. I could hardly have hoped that we would have got into such interesting and important areas with such a seemingly innocuous amendment. I thank the Minister for his response, which I shall consider closely. I could hardly expect him to have conceded a second opposition amendment so soon after the previous one. He has, however, used the same argument as his honourable friend in the other place. I was not entirely convinced by his explanation about why, for example, granting the Secretary of State explicit power to review a licence is not sufficiently obvious also not to need inclusion. I am sure that we will want to return to this point on Report. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 20 agreed to. Clauses 21 to 26 agreed to. Clause 27 [Inspectors]: [Amendment No. 10 not moved.] Clause 27 agreed to. Clause 28 agreed to. Clause 29 [Requirement for public register]:


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c282GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Decommissioning Carbon dioxide Carbon capture and storage Commercial secrets Licensing Inspections Environment protection Energy Industrial accidents EU emissions trading scheme Natural gas Offshore industry Storage Seas and oceans Carbon emissions
Legislation
Energy Bill 2007-08
Draft Marine Bill
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk