Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Kelvin Hopkins (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 12 June 2008. It occurred during Adjournment debate on European Commission.


European Commission

That might be a long-term approach, but in the short term the decision went in favour of employers, not employees. However, that is just an aside. I wanted to talk in general about several economic aspects of the European Union. Like a number of people in the Labour party, both inside and outside Parliament, I oppose the Lisbon treaty. I did not just support a referendum, but I would have voted no. It is interesting that Ireland, which has been referred to, is holding a referendum today, and there is a possibility of a no vote, which would save us an awful lot of trouble. I hope that there will be a no vote. I should welcome that and cheer it. I should probably have a glass of good French champagne to celebrate. The skies would not fall in; we would have the status quo, which is far too integrated even now. I am one of those people who would have liked, as I have said many times here and in the main Chamber, a referendum on the Single European Act and on the Maastricht treaty. Those fairly fundamental changes were the change of direction—the real speeding up of the process of integration towards what I believe is a state of Europe, or a country of Europe, which will eventually completely marginalise the elected nation state Governments and Parliaments.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
477 c152WH 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Administration of justice Conservation Climate change Competition Immigration Energy EU enlargement European Union EU internal trade Labelling Financial markets EU institutions Standards Bosnia and Herzegovina North Macedonia Reform Regulation Kosovo European Commission Renewable energy Croatia Serbia Turkey Galileo system EU trade Treaty of Lisbon
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk