Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 9 July 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Housing and Regeneration Bill.
Housing and Regeneration Bill
My Lords, I do not know whether the noble Earl intends to divide the House on this; I will go with the Government because there comes a point when one just has to accept what is being said. Can the noble Baroness explain why it is important to leave the objective in this place when subsection (13) states: "““The order in which the objectives are listed in this section is not significant””?"
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 703 c764
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Children Community development Capital gains tax Housing Land Health hazards Electricity Inheritance tax Housing Corporation Landlord and tenant Home information packs Electric cables Local government Property transfer Public participation Prices Private rented housing Social rented housing Taxation Tenants Trusts Regeneration Leukaemia Electromagnetic fields Homes and Communities Agency Tenant Services Authority Community land trusts
- Legislation
- Housing and Regeneration Bill 2007-08
- Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988
- Inheritance Tax Act 1984
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:38:23 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_491085
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_491085
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_491085