Proceeding contribution from Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 14 July 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.
Pensions Bill
I support those comments and I am grateful to my noble friend. I am concerned here with the benefits of this amendment on behalf of whichever company comes to create this function. It may or may not be the one about which I have spoken and it was identified before I rose to speak. I am concerned with the principle because other companies will come into this field to provide similar services, and it is appropriate that this amendment should be supported on their behalf too.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 703 c1027
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Companies Annuities Competition Administrative delays Equality Health Eligibility Gender Income tax Divorce Insolvency Discrimination Financial assistance scheme Index linking Private sector Workplace pensions Pensions Lump sum payments Pension Protection Fund PAYE Scotland State retirement pensions Regulation Taxation Retirement State earnings related pension scheme Pensions Regulator Private equity Civil partnerships dissolution State second pension Impact assessments
- Legislation
- Pensions Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:09:54 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492122
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492122
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492122