Proceeding contribution from Andrew Love (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 21 July 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Housing and Regeneration Bill.
Housing and Regeneration Bill
I welcome the fact that the Government have responded to this issue, which has been outstanding for some time, but let me press my hon. Friend on two matters relating to the amendments. First, the basis of the decision by the Court of Appeal on this matter was that immigration control had no legitimate bearing on a British citizen, and the question therefore continues to arise as to whether the amendments respond to that decision. Secondly, there is still a form of discrimination relating to people in those circumstances, because they will have recourse only to the private sector and not to the social sector. How does the Minister respond to those concerns?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 479 c611
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disability Construction Cooperation Council housing Design Audit Commission Housing Inspections Immigration Housing associations Homelessness Landlord and tenant Local government Planning permission Property transfer Older people Standards Regulation Social rented housing Trespass Tenants Tenants' rights Regeneration Homes and Communities Agency Tenant Services Authority Community land trusts
- Legislation
- Housing and Regeneration Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 23:40:48 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_495260
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_495260
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_495260