Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Tom Harris (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 22 July 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Crossrail Bill.


Crossrail Bill

I am grateful for the hon. Gentleman's comments, but I fear that I may not be in a position to offer him as full a response as he as requested. I should be more than happy to write to him, but I hope he will accept my reassurances from the Dispatch Box. I suddenly feel inspiration descend. I am talking off the top of my head, of course. The new objective in clause 22 is desirable because the ORR should specifically address issues such as those relating to the network code that could frustrate Crossrail construction. However, the objectives of the ORR are considered and weighed collectively. The ORR will therefore have to balance the interests of Crossrail construction with those of affected users and operators. I trust that that reassures the hon. Gentleman.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
479 c755 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Access Compulsory purchase Assets Construction Arbitration Cooperation Elizabeth line Crossrail Delegated legislation Department for Transport Land Greater London Greater London Authority Exemptions Franchises Property transfer Public sector Railways Railway network Noise London Underground Network Rail Public private partnerships Regulation Repairs and maintenance Underground railways Transport for London BAA Office of Rail Regulation
Legislation
Crossrail Bill 2004/05 to 2005-06 to 2006-07 to 2007-08
Control of Pollution Act 1974
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk