Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Redesdale (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 22 October 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Energy Bill.


Energy Bill

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Jenkin, makes an interesting and useful point, but it is irrelevant here. I say that not facetiously; I mean that it is irrelevant because no schemes can be put in place that would in any way affect the ROCs. We cannot create an industry over the next short period that will suddenly, within five to 10 years, flood the marketplace with technology that does not exist at the moment and is not ready to be built, although if such things did happen, I would think it fantastic. The other point is that the amendment talks about the Minister setting the cap by being technology specific, but I doubt that we will see no other energy Bill come forward in the next few years to change that. Therefore, we are talking about the situation on the ground in the next few years, so bringing forward a much higher cap as an incentive to develop these technologies has to be a good thing.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c1172-3 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Decommissioning Costs Combined heat and power Carbon dioxide Fees and charges Licensing Energy Electricity generation Oil Planning permission Nuclear power Nuclear power stations Noise Meters Microgeneration Storage Safety Renewable energy Technology Wind power Geothermal power Renewables obligation Nuclear Liabilities Financing Assurance Board
Legislation
Energy Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk