Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 22 October 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Energy Bill.


Energy Bill

My Lords, I readily agree that the statutory instrument is always an attractive option for Ministers standing at the Dispatch Box. It gives the Government a great deal of discretion in making changes and adaptations. There is always a debate in your Lordships’ House about the extent to which we use statutory instruments as opposed to primary legislation. It is certainly true that, as the noble Lord, Lord Redesdale, suggested, there may be further energy Bills down the road—though, as he knows, I could not possibly comment. I have discussed this matter with my officials and the issue comes back to investor confidence. The point that has been put to us is that we need a limit in the Bill in order to maintain investor confidence. That goes to the heart of the dilemma in our wanting sufficient flexibility to take account of developments that may take place in the future. We are very concerned not to do anything to undermine investor confidence in the ROC system.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c1177 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Decommissioning Costs Combined heat and power Carbon dioxide Fees and charges Licensing Energy Electricity generation Oil Planning permission Nuclear power Nuclear power stations Noise Meters Microgeneration Storage Safety Renewable energy Technology Wind power Geothermal power Renewables obligation Nuclear Liabilities Financing Assurance Board
Legislation
Energy Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk