Proceeding contribution from Lord Whitty (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 22 October 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Energy Bill.
Energy Bill
My Lords, I cannot directly answer the noble Lord’s question on whether there has been formal consultation. The original decision to allow permitted development status to microtechnology was brought forward by those Ministers appropriate for planning, the CLG Ministers, who will have consulted the local authorities in some form or another. I am reasonably confident that local authorities are aware of that and may have raised issues that led the Government to delay the extension to all forms of microgeneration technology. Clearly, a statutory instrument brought forward by the Government, as I encourage the Minister to do, would be subject to objection by local authorities and others, and therefore we would go through that process. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 45 [Modification of approved programme]:
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 704 c1185
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Decommissioning Costs Combined heat and power Carbon dioxide Fees and charges Licensing Energy Electricity generation Oil Planning permission Nuclear power Nuclear power stations Noise Meters Microgeneration Storage Safety Renewable energy Technology Wind power Geothermal power Renewables obligation Nuclear Liabilities Financing Assurance Board
- Legislation
- Energy Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 01:01:25 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_502792
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_502792
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_502792