Proceeding contribution from Andrew Dismore (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 4 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Employment Bill [Lords].
Employment Bill [Lords]
There is a catch-all provision in proposed new subsection (4G) relating to circumstances in which"““the decision to exclude or expel is taken unfairly””," and the subsequent hardship provisions provide additional safeguards, which my hon. Friend's new clause would not do. The additional safeguards in clause 19 are the kind of safeguards that the Joint Committee on Human Rights report talked about, and that the ASLEF judgment hinted at. On balance, I think that we have to leave clause 19 in place—imperfect though it is—rather than adopting my hon. Friend's new clause, even though he and I wish to obtain the same objective in the end.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 482 c204
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Contracts Ballots Climate change Employment Industrial relations Industrial disputes Information Employment agencies Leave Protection Membership Minimum wage Political parties Redundancy Tribunals Trade unions Strikes Unfair dismissal British National Party Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen
- Legislation
- Employment Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 01:25:45 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_505836
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_505836
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_505836