Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 6 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Planning Bill.


Planning Bill

My Lords, how does the Minister reconcile what he has just said with the actual words in the amendment? It says: "““Before designating a statement as a national policy statement for the purposes of this Act the Secretary of State must be satisfied””." The substance of the right reverend Prelate’s amendment is a responsibility on the Secretary of State to be satisfied that, "““policies in the statement contribute to the mitigation of, and adaptation to, climate change””," sustainability, and all those other things. It is the Secretary of State who must be satisfied to that effect. So I do not follow the Minister’s deduction that the amendment in some way diverts the responsibility from where it clearly lies in the amendment, which is with the Secretary of State.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
705 c390 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disability Devolved matters Accountability Climate change Countryside Cultural heritage Airports Design Legal profession Environment protection Infrastructure Legislation Floods Local government Ministerial powers Planning permission Public appointments Planning Publicity Railways Parliamentary scrutiny Public participation Passenger transport executives National parks Scotland Transport Regional planning and development Sustainable development Wind power Broads Authority Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements
Legislation
Planning Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk