Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Andrews (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 6 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Planning Bill.


Planning Bill

moved Amendments Nos. 38 and 39: 38: Clause 11, page 6, line 2, after ““that”” insert ““the condition in subsection (1A) or (1B) is met. (1A) The condition is that—”” 39: Clause 11, page 6, line 9, at end insert— ““(1B) The condition is that— (a) since the time when part of a national policy statement (““the relevant part””) was first published or (if later) last reviewed, there has been a significant change in any circumstances on the basis of which any of the policy set out in the relevant part was decided, (b) the change was not anticipated at that time, and (c) if the change had been anticipated at that time, any of the policy set out in the relevant part would have been materially different.”” On Question, amendments agreed to. [Amendment No. 40 not moved.]


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
705 c428 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disability Devolved matters Accountability Climate change Countryside Cultural heritage Airports Design Legal profession Environment protection Infrastructure Legislation Floods Local government Ministerial powers Planning permission Public appointments Planning Publicity Railways Parliamentary scrutiny Public participation Passenger transport executives National parks Scotland Transport Regional planning and development Sustainable development Wind power Broads Authority Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements
Legislation
Planning Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk