Proceeding contribution from Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 5 November 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Policing and Crime Bill.
Policing and Crime Bill
My Lords, I am glad that the noble Lord, Lord Bradshaw, has approached the amendment in the way that he has, because I must admit that I was somewhat surprised to see it on the Marshalled List given the detail into which the Minister went in Committee. I am now satisfied that, as drafted, the arrangements are sufficiently flexible to allow the British Transport Police to be a member of the groups in question. I am also grateful for the assurance that the Government gave in Committee that they will continuously monitor arrangements to see whether they need to be changed. It would be useful to have further thoughts from the Minister on Amendment 100A and the "extensivity", perhaps—I cannot think of the word—of the British Transport Police.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 714 c484
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Children Data protection Databases Clubs Crime Alcoholic drinks Crimes of violence Confiscation orders Airports DNA Evidence Licensing Extradition Fixed penalties Injunctions Offenders Police Photographs Licensing laws Passports Prostitution Young offenders Security Trespass Sports Travel requirements USA Sex establishments Common travel area Designated public places orders Body samples
- Legislation
- Policing and Crime Bill 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:41:13 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_592955
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_592955
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_592955