Proceeding contribution from John Pugh (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Monday, 30 November 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Financial Services Bill.
Financial Services Bill
I am a little unclear about what the hon. Gentleman is saying. He seems to be saying two completely different things. He seems to be saying that this is an architectural change of which he disapproves, but he also seems to be agreeing with the hon. Member for Tatton (Mr. Osborne) that it is a purely cosmetic change. It cannot be both, can it?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 501 c907
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Consumers Banks Credit Education Financial services Financial institutions International cooperation Financial Services Authority EU action Protection Pay Powers Regulation Stocks and shares Treasury Financial Services Compensation Scheme Council for Financial Stability Class actions
- Legislation
- Financial Services Bill 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-11 09:58:23 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_597678
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_597678
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_597678