Proceeding contribution from Chris Mole (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 25 February 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Rail Fares and Franchises.
Rail Fares and Franchises
We would always seek to avoid such protection arrangements that produce perverse incentives, such as discouraging operators from investing in the promotion of additional journeys because the benefits would not accrue to them, but return to the Department. As I was saying, in assessing bids, we intend to place greater weight on additional ideas and options generated by bidders. We are looking at rewarding franchisees that come up with investment or improvement proposals to be delivered after the contract term. We need to keep a strong focus on performance and make sure franchisees deliver for passengers. All rail franchises incorporate performance requirements, which we monitor closely. We aim to ensure that all rail franchise commitments are delivered, that franchise agreements are complied with and that, if appropriate, the taxpayer is reimbursed when operators do not deliver the obligations in their franchise agreements.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 506 c169WH
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Capital investment Contracts for services Fares Infrastructure Franchises East Coast main line Railways Passengers Regulation Tickets National Express
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 22:51:42 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_624508
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_624508
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_624508