Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 28 June 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Academies Bill [HL].


Academies Bill [HL]

This relates to a debate I had earlier with the noble Baroness, Lady Royall, who asked: why the rush? Our answer to that question is that we know there are schools which appear to be keen to convert and to take advantage of academy freedoms. Our instinct is that, given that information and given the choice between going slow and cracking on with it, and providing answers about the strategic role of local authorities going forward, as I fully accept we must, we incline to the latter view. I fully recognise the experience of my noble friend Lord Greaves in the proper role of local authorities. I hope that he will contribute to our deliberations on these matters. He said that these amendments are meant to illustrate a point rather than being particularly prescriptive in their intent. I have listened to what he said and will continue to reflect on it. I hope that in the light of that he may feel able to withdraw his amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
719 c1627 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Education Disability Bullying Admissions Curriculum Charities Community interest companies Buildings Design Ancillary staff Classroom assistants Hearing impairment Equality Freedom of information Governing bodies Grammar schools Inspections Faith schools Food Local government Qualifications Parents Pre-school education Pupil exclusions Pay Property transfer Public bodies Nutrition Monitoring Primary education Standards Safety Personal, social, health and economic education Registration Schools Teachers Special educational needs Secondary education Free schools Academies Ofsted
Legislation
Academies Bill (HL) 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk