Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Davies of Stamford (Labour) in the House of Lords on Friday, 12 November 2010. It occurred during Debate on Strategic Defence and Security Review.


Strategic Defence and Security Review

I will, of course, take the noble Lord’s advice, which I know is kindly intended. The Government have shown what their priorities are. Nothing could be more dramatic than the fact that the Government are giving about £300 million to India by way of aid. India is buying aircraft carriers and aircraft to put on them, and then the Government say that they do not have the money to continue with our own carrier strike capability. In response to the noble Lord, I think that says it all. Finally, I take the last rag of cloth that protects the nakedness of the Government in these arguments: the Anglo-French alliance. Can we rely on the ““Charles de Gaulle”” being mobilised to defend the Falklands? I do not think that anybody in this House seriously suggests that we can. All my life, I have been in favour of European defence collaboration and, indeed, of a common European defence policy. I am delighted by the treaty that has been concluded, but any successful relationship of that kind requires three things. The first is that it is done out of conviction, sincerity and long-term commitment. The noble Lord is nodding his head. I hope and pray that that long-term commitment is there. I am not going impugn the good faith of the Government; I am going to assume that it is there, but I have to tell the noble Lord that, because of the background of Dr Fox and Mr Cameron, there is bound to be considerable scepticism on both sides of the channel about that, so the Government are going to have to make sure that by their every word and deed this is taken seriously. Secondly, if you are going to have that kind of relationship, you need a shared view of the world and a shared foreign policy so that you know that your partner is going to take the same decisions and will be there with you when you need him. None of that is present. Thirdly, you need some kind of coherent decision-making structure that can give one confidence that we will be able to work together effectively no matter what the threat is and where it comes from. On that basis, I see enormous scope—not just involving carrier strike but also escorts, tanks, helicopters and so forth—for collaboration and synergies with the French, but those three things are essential, and if the Government can provide them, in that matter they will certainly have my warmest support.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
722 c467 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Armed forces Decommissioning Defence Defence equipment France Nuclear weapons Public expenditure Peacekeeping operations Procurement Military aircraft Military alliances Ministry of Defence Afghanistan Aircraft carriers Harrier aircraft F-35 aircraft Conflict prevention A400M aircraft Trident Cuts Nimrod aircraft Tornado aircraft Strategic Defence and Security Review HMS Ark Royal
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk