Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Peston (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 December 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [HL].


Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [HL]

Yes, categorically. The Bill refers to them as the staff of the OBR. We can argue about language, but if somebody asks who my staff are, I say, ““He works for me and so does he. They are on my budget and they are my staff””. Sorry, I should have said ““she””. If someone said to me, ““Actually, they are not, they are Treasury officials on secondment,”” I would not regard that as a correct use of the words ““my staff””. The Minister may agree with the noble Lord, Lord Turnbull, that the point made by my noble friend Lord Barnett and me does not matter, and may be perfectly happy for them to be on secondment, work part time and so on. If that is the position, I would like to know. My position is that an independent body appoints its own staff, and they are its staff.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
722 c197GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Audit Finance Fiscal policy Economic situation Economic policy Forecasts Public appointments Public expenditure Staff Public finance Public sector debt Treasury Treasury Committee Office for Budget Responsibility Chote, Robert
Legislation
Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill (HL) 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk