Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Henley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 14 December 2010. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Higher Education (Basic Amount) (England) Regulations 2010.


Higher Education (Basic Amount) (England) Regulations 2010

I believe that the institutions themselves can benefit from this, as I made clear in my opening remarks. The institutions are autonomous; they are not, as the noble Lord, Lord Triesman, put it, emanations of the state. Those autonomous institutions can make decisions on what courses they offer in seeking to attract appropriate students and on matters such as the length of courses and in what fields they are offered. There will be changes, but it is not for the Government to predict what will happen. We believe that we are making provision for students and those from less well-off families and we are providing opportunities for the institutions themselves. We also believe that it is necessary to put the measures in place so that everyone knows what is happening for the academic year starting in autumn 2012. That is why I stress again, as I have done two or three times, that the amendments in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Triesman, are fatal.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
723 c593 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Debts Fees and charges Higher education Humanities Earned income Loans Low pay Part-time education Universities Repayments Students Student numbers
Legislation
Higher Education Act 2004
Higher Education (Basic Amount) (England) Regulations 2010
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk