Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 April 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Public Bodies Bill [HL].

Public Bodies Bill [HL]

The next subsection uses ““must””. I know that this is a very familiar argument, but it is quite clear that ““must”” is often used in legislation and I do not see why it is not used in this case.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
726 c1574 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Devolved matters Consumers Agriculture Conservation Closures Coastal areas Devolution Finance Flood control Environment Legislative competence Forestry Forestry Commission Environment Agency Drinking water Ministerial powers Northern Ireland Protection Public bodies Public consultation National Assembly for Wales Parliamentary scrutiny Non-departmental public bodies Trade unions Wales Welsh Government Citizens Advice Marine Management Organisation Consumer Council for Northern Ireland Regional flood defence committees Consumer Focus Statutory instruments
Legislation
Public Bodies Bill (HL) 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk