Proceeding contribution from Lord Bradshaw (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 8 November 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Protection of Freedoms Bill.
Protection of Freedoms Bill
My Lords, I am going to deal with something very down to earth when contrasted with the noble Lord, Lord Selsdon. It concerns Chapter 2 on the clamping and towing away of vehicles. We are concerned that what are now rogue clampers will become rogue ticketers. It was argued in another place that the existing consumer law—the Fraud Act and the Theft Act—provide suitable protection for cities. I do not share that view and neither does Citizens Advice, because resorting to law is extremely long-winded and expensive. We have to deal with these issues effectively during the passage of this Bill. First, we have to be certain that there is an independent appeals body that is funded by the industry, and that its existence is made plain both on the notices and the parking tickets that are received by people. We should insist that those who have the power to issue tickets should be members of an accredited trade association. I believe there is only one at the moment, but we have to take account of the fact that there will be more than one. The appeals body to which I have referred should be able to decide on a reasonable level of charging by reference to the charges imposed by local authorities or several adjacent car parks. It should be possible, even though charges will vary in many places. The appeals body should also take account of the fact that the car park is properly lit and that, if people are to be penalised for parking over the dividing lines, those lines are clearly marked on the ground—not a small swab of paint in the corner, but properly marked. All that can be covered in regulations. The most important thing is that we are clear that only properly accredited people can access the DVLA database. That is the key. I am certain that, now, a lot of absolutely awful people are getting access to it. I shall delay your Lordships for one or two more moments. I was a member of a police authority for a long time, and when I was, we had many cases of people accessing databases on an irregular basis. We have to be certain that only bona fide parking operators have that access.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 732 c197-8
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Disability Children Civil liberties Data protection Databases Counter-terrorism Criminal records Biometrics Crime Detainees Convictions Electronic surveillance Freedom of information Homosexuality Fingerprints DNA Evidence Immobilisation of vehicles ICT Fines Internet Ministerial powers Motor vehicles Parking Powers of entry Personal records Protection Police Powers Pupils Scotland Universities Vetting Terrorism Schools Stop and search Vulnerable adults Surveillance Young people Sports Voluntary work Stalking Henry VIII clauses Information Commissioner's Office Interception of Communications Commissioner Office of Surveillance Commissioners Social media
- Legislation
- Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 19:37:04 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_783228
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_783228
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_783228