Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Henley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 12 January 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Protection of Freedoms Bill.


Protection of Freedoms Bill

My Lords, as I am sure that the noble and learned Lord will be aware, we never comment on the advice that we might or might not have received from the law officers, and I am not prepared to comment on this occasion. However, I join the noble and learned Lord in speculating on the very odd constitutional effects that an amendment such as this could have on the passage of legislation. It cannot be right that by submitting an appeal an outside party can restrict the passage of legislation. That is the crucial point in relation to this amendment. I will give way to the noble Lord, Lord Wills, in a moment if he can just keep calm. It would restrict the passage of legislation in Parliament and in effect govern how this place or another place does its business.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
734 c43GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Children Disclosure of information Contracts Databases Codes of practice Courts Administration of justice Health Health services Fees and charges Land Freedom of information EU law Human trafficking Exemptions Legislation Higher education Landlords Local government Private sector Ownership Powers of entry Personal records Northern Ireland Prosecutions Public interest Public bodies Parliamentary scrutiny Unadopted roads Scotland Universities Republic of Ireland Sexual offences Research Rented housing Science USA Royal assent Risk assessment Information Commissioner's Office
Legislation
Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk