Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 12 January 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Protection of Freedoms Bill.


Protection of Freedoms Bill

The advice ““Don’t go to law”” might be extended to ““Be very careful about buying a house on an unadopted road””. The former private enterprise, which the noble Lord, Lord Soley, described, of clamping one’s neighbours’ vehicles is quite extreme. Perhaps I may ask a few questions. I do not suggest that the problems the noble Lord has described are not important but, on the amendment, first, is he suggesting that this extends to any public authority beyond the Land Registry? I suppose that local authorities holding a local land charges register might be relevant, but this is all public authorities. Secondly, on whether the letter from the Land Registry did not refer to land having gone to the Crown in the situation of intestacy, and thirdly, whether there is a concern about more than the adoption of roads. The amendment is more extensive than that, as I understand the thrust of it.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
734 c58GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Children Disclosure of information Contracts Databases Codes of practice Courts Administration of justice Health Health services Fees and charges Land Freedom of information EU law Human trafficking Exemptions Legislation Higher education Landlords Local government Private sector Ownership Powers of entry Personal records Northern Ireland Prosecutions Public interest Public bodies Parliamentary scrutiny Unadopted roads Scotland Universities Republic of Ireland Sexual offences Research Rented housing Science USA Royal assent Risk assessment Information Commissioner's Office
Legislation
Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk