Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 31 January 2012. It occurred during Ministerial statement on EU Council.


EU Council

I join the noble Lord, Lord Brittan, in saying that the Prime Minister was extremely well advised not to contest the use of the institutions in the context of this intergovernmental agreement. I would only add, gently, that you cannot reserve your position on a decision that you are not a party to. Can the Minister now answer a question that I have been asking with a certain persistence without getting any answers: what provisions in the intergovernmental agreement are objectionable to the British Government? He has just spoken warmly about Article 2, and I imagine that he could speak quite warmly about most of the other articles, so why are we not joining the agreement? It is a little difficult to understand. Perhaps the Prime Minister let the cat out of the bag when, with a look of some relief on his face—at least it looked like that on my television set—he said, ““Nothing to sign. Nothing to ratify””—and, he might have added, ““Nothing to make me run the gauntlet of my Back-Benchers””.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
734 c1479 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Business Digital technology Energy EU internal trade EU action EU external trade Economic and monetary union Oil Nuclear weapons Patents Politics and government Treaties Regulation Sanctions Service industries Myanmar European Commission European Court of Justice European Council Iran Syria
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk